By Seyla Benhabib
In those vital lectures, individual political thinker Seyla Benhabib argues that because the UN assertion of Human Rights in 1948, now we have entered a section of worldwide civil society that is ruled by way of cosmopolitan norms of common justice--norms that are tricky for a few to just accept as valid because they're occasionally in clash with democratic beliefs. In her first lecture, Benhabib argues that this stress can by no means be totally resolved, however it will be mitigated during the renegotiation of the twin commitments to human rights and sovereign self-determination. Her moment lecture develops this concept intimately, with distinct connection with fresh advancements in Europe (for instance, the banning of Muslim head scarves in France). the ecu has obvious the alternative of the conventional unitary version of citizenship with a brand new version that disaggregates the elements of conventional citizenship, making it attainable to be a citizen of a number of entities even as. the amount additionally includes a sizeable creation via Robert put up, the quantity editor, and contributions by way of Bonnie Honig (Northwestern University), Will Kymlicka (Queens University), and Jeremy Waldron (Columbia college of Law).
Read or Download Another Cosmopolitanism (The Berkeley Tanner Lectures) PDF
Best history & theory books
This quantity starts to discover the lifestyles and works of Auguste Comte in the course of his so-called moment occupation, the debatable interval that started in 1842 and lasted until eventually his loss of life. This quantity covers the years from 1842 to 1852, whilst Comte remodeled his confident philosophy right into a political and non secular move.
In Making education appropriate for the worldwide Age, R. D. Nordgren, Ph. D. contends that America's faculties are failing to arrange our kids for the worldwide financial system in addition to failing to improve electorate prepared and able to maintaining the kind of democracy essential to coexist within the worldwide Village.
Within the uprisings of the Arab international, Alain Badiou discerns echoes of the ecu revolutions of 1848. In either instances, the thing was once to overthrow despotic regimes maintained via the nice powers—regimes designed to impose the desire of economic oligarchies. either occasions happened after what was once usually regarded as the top of a progressive epoch: in 1815, the ultimate defeat of Napoleon; and in 1989, the autumn of the Soviet Union.
- Cambridge History of 20th Century Political Thought
- Theories of Secession (European Political Science)
- Language and Politics (Readings in Social and Political Theory)
- Powderburns: Cocaine, Contras & the Drug War
Extra resources for Another Cosmopolitanism (The Berkeley Tanner Lectures)
Cosmopolitanism and Discursive Scope The term ‘cosmopolitanism,’ along with ‘empire’ and ‘globalization,’ has become one of the keywords of our times. For some, cosmopolitanism signiﬁes an attitude of enlightened morality that does not place 18 • Seyla Benhabib ‘love of country’ ahead of ‘love of mankind’ (Martha Nussbaum); for others, cosmopolitanism signiﬁes hybridity, ﬂuidity, and recognizing the fractured and internally riven character of human selves and citizens, whose complex aspirations cannot be circumscribed by national fantasies and primordial communities (Jeremy Waldron).
Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order from Grotius to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). 25. See Karl Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of History, trans. : Yale University Press, 1953), pp. 193–213. 26. The establishment of the European Union has been accompanied by a Charter of Fundamental Rights. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which encompasses states that are not EU members as well, permits the claims of citizens of adhering states to be heard by a European Court of Human Rights.
At times, this is a concession to political realism on their part; more often though, and particularly for Kant and Arendt, the division of humankind into self-governing polities is not a factum brutum but has a value in itself. Whereas Jaspers is ultimately willing to abdicate republican self-governance and entertain the possibility of world government,25 neither Kant nor Arendt can reconcile world government with the values of private and public autonomy. Therefore, the tension between the demands of cosmopolitan justice and the values of republican self-governance is greatest in their work.