By Christopher W. Morris
Amartya Sen was once provided the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1998 "for his contributions in welfare economics." even supposing his fundamental educational appointments were ordinarily in economics, Sen can also be an immense and influential social theorist and thinker. His paintings on social selection idea is seminal, and his writings on poverty, famine, and improvement, besides his contributions to ethical and political philosophy, are very important and influential. Sen's perspectives concerning the nature and primacy of liberty additionally make him a tremendous modern liberal philosopher. This quantity of essays on facets of Sen's paintings is aimed toward a extensive viewers of readers drawn to social thought, political philosophy, ethics, public coverage, welfare economics, the idea of rational selection, poverty, and improvement. Written by way of a group of recognized specialists, every one bankruptcy presents an outline of Sen's paintings in a specific zone and a severe evaluation of his contributions to the sphere.
Read or Download Amartya Sen (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus) PDF
Similar social philosophy books
Essays by means of well-known figures during this publication take on an array of simple matters in political and social philosophy. each one contributor considers the theoretical and useful difficulties of an enormous subject and the realization of the e-book seeks to answer and reconcile the various arguments offered.
Scaned book,2 pages on 1,vertical
Ready for print(print on lengthy facet)
- Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Relations: Disenchantment and Re-Enchantment
- The Freewill Question
- British Idealism and the Concept of the Self
- Economic Sociodynamics
Extra info for Amartya Sen (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus)
Given this expanded set of options, the woman now chooses to go back to her hotel. Again, the agent’s behavior seems to violate Condition α. However, the woman’s behavior does not seem to be odd in any way. 22 SHATAKSHEE DHONGDE AND PRASANTA K. 2. 1, the person is trying to be polite by not picking from the fruit tray the only remaining fruit. However, what constitutes polite choice depends on the “menu” represented by the contents of the fruit tray. Thus, the value for the agent of his or her choice depends on the menu.
It may be worth noting that the assumption of self-oriented welfare is by no means universal in economics. ” For example, although the two fundamental theorems make the assumption of selforiented welfare, in the theory of general equilibrium itself, we also have a much more general analytical framework that allows a consumer’s welfare to be affected by the consumption bundles of other consumers as well as the production plans of producers (for an incisive discussion of externalities, see Arrow ).
3. The agent’s choices satisfy Condition α if, and only if, for all possible sets, H and K, of feasible alternatives, and for all x ∈ X, if H is a subset of K and x belongs to H − C(H ), then x belongs to K − C(K ). Condition α stipulates that, if a person rejects x when choosing from a given set of feasible alternatives, then he or she should not choose x when the set of feasible alternatives is expanded by adding to the set some new alternatives. 3. The Theory of Rational Choice under Certainty: The Choice-Based Framework As we noted, the starting point of the preference-based theory of rational choice is the agent’s preferences over a given universal set of options.